From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2869 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2013 05:26:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2843 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2013 05:26:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:26:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2R5QKnm005577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:26:20 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2R5QID5012335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:26:19 -0400 Message-ID: <515282FA.4000800@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:26:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sefer Tov CC: Jan Murawski , "insight@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Building problem References: <51524177.3080504@oelgoetze.de>,<51527450.6020308@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On 03/26/2013 10:15 PM, Sefer Tov wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I was actually trying to build the CVS HEAD version. I built that this afternoon for x86_64-linux without incident. > Seems like parts of the GDB code just won't compile with GCC 4.6 > complaining about C++ adherence problems (parts of the simulator) and > after repeatedly patching them I eventually had to give up. I assume > that an older compiler (maybe GCC 3.4 or 4.3) would accept that code > however it's harder to get them built for a dual-arch (x86/x64) environment. Over the past few days, there has been quite a bit of brokenness in the simulators. Developers are working to sort it out. See, for example: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-03/msg00871.html [This is not the only thread on it; just the one I remember reading about the most over the past week.] Does your problem sound anything like that? [It doesn't really, but without actual log of the build, it is unwise to commit. :-)] > Have you tried building the CVS HEAD with newer GCC? I wonder if you'd > be encountering the same issues. I'm using gcc version 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2) (GCC). This is the Fedora 15 system compiler. Keith