From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31309 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2014 21:32:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31298 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2014 21:32:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:32:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RLWIt3000376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:32:18 -0500 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RLWGAu016823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: <52E6D060.60904@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:32:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Fedin CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Bundled TCL/TK - update needed References: <003101cf169c$a0793140$e16b93c0$%fedin@samsung.com> <87y529e4vj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <004e01cf1b30$e76834a0$b6389de0$%fedin@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <004e01cf1b30$e76834a0$b6389de0$%fedin@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-q1/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 On 01/26/2014 11:25 PM, Pavel Fedin wrote: >> How about migrating insight out of CVS and also simply not having Tcl >> and Tk in the tree? > > Well... > 1. It's just convenient to have all dependencies. > 2. Where is the new GIT repository ? Some people on this ML claim it > exists, but the web page doesn't even mention it. Yeah, I've been working on this a bit over the past weeks. Stay tuned for something. Probably the first go will have no tcl/tk/itcl and probably only work on linux. Next big revision will contain fixes for MinGW. Next revision for Cygiwn (using X, as requested by upstream). Right now, I do not plan to put tcl/tk into repo, but I may very well add it later on another branch of master, or I will package cygwin and mingw Tcl, Tk, Itcl, Iwidgets for use by the build. Or at least that's what I'm thinking right now... ;-) Keith