From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14765 invoked by alias); 5 May 2003 19:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14756 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 19:12:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MM01SNLNTO.son.sandia.gov) (132.175.109.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 May 2003 19:12:46 -0000 Received: from 132.175.109.4 by mm02snlnto.son.sandia.gov with ESMTP ( Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay 01 (MMS v5.5.0)); Mon, 05 May 2003 13:12:26 -0600 Received: from ES01SNLNT.sandia.gov (es01snlnt.sandia.gov [134.253.130.4]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h45I9Ibo006545 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:09: 18 -0600 (MDT) Received: by es01snlnt.sandia.gov with Internet Mail Service ( 5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:09:19 -0600 Message-ID: <71251C7D5FB1D2119C8F0008C7A44ED10379207F@es07snlnt.sandia.gov> From: "Liang, James" To: "'insight@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: xfer_memory instead of target_read_memory in gdbtk_dis_asm_read_m emory Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:12:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 12A869522452-842-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Why is it that gdbtk_dis_asm_read_memory uses xfer_memory instead of target_read_memory?? I see the documented assumption, but why is that assumption made? James