From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29499 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2014 17:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2014 17:13:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:13:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s09HDu4Y001670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:13:56 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s09HDsE2009101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:13:55 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: Insight List Subject: Re: [PATCH] use an observer instead of deprecated_file_changed_hook References: <871u0jhamf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52CC5D85.8030400@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52CC5D85.8030400@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:03:17 -0800") Message-ID: <87txdd9iy5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-q1/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> I believe I also then followed with "file" (no Keith> executable), which should simple clear state and "empty" all the Keith> windows. This one failed with my patch. I'm trying a new patch to see if I can make it work reasonably well with the existing observers. I'll let you know. Tom