From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29289 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2014 17:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29259 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2014 17:18:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:18:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6MHIBDm028932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:18:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-154.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.154]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6MHI9VX028616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:18:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: Patrick Monnerat , insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Is the project still alive ? References: <53AB5285.3020909@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <53AB5285.3020909@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:51:49 -0700") Message-ID: <87y4vlqpm7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Keith> A GIT repository exists, but I have not yet pushed it to Keith> sourceware. When I last played with this, I wasn't very pleased by the Keith> direction it was going. It was essentially a clone of the gdb repo Keith> with the insight/libgui bits thrown in. Yuck. [If anyone has any Keith> better ideas, I'm all eyes/ears.] I don't really have a good solution for you. One idea is git submodules plus mumble mumble something to make it work nicely. Maybe you noticed my handwaving. Another idea is to just have a regular branch with periodic merges from gdb. This means a messier history perhaps but it would certainly work. Either way it would be nice to know what is going on, as insight is the only user of some APIs in gdb, and I have some un-committed patches to change some of these -- blocked since the insight situation is unclear. Tom