From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23535 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2014 09:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23523 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2014 09:52:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.datasphere.ch Received: from mail.datasphere.ch (HELO mail.datasphere.ch) (195.70.3.149) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:52:47 +0000 Received: from dataspheresrv01.datasphere.ch (ForestDnsZones.datasphere.ch [195.70.3.151]) by mail.datasphere.ch (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s9S9qXF4009848; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:52:38 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Request for a larger icon Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <544E939D.5010300@redhat.com> References: <544E939D.5010300@redhat.com> From: "Patrick Monnerat" To: "Keith Seitz" , X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 =20 Keith Seitz wrote: > However, I see that we're still using GNUPro branding from twenty years ago but the web site has been changed. I'm not a huge fan of the web site's logo, but I think it better than using GNUPro all over the place. You may be right: I googled for a insight/gdbtk/gnupro logo without success: I do not have the historical background for insight/gnupro. > So ideally what size would you like icons? At least 64x64, but 256x256 would be better. A vectorial icon would be great (we can instantiate any size). See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1157545. > I think I can convince my wife (also a professional graphic designer) to whip us up some graphics.=20 This would be great! A professional work is almost always better. So I won't start a redesign myself. > How quickly do you need it? Currently I scale up the existing icon at package build time: this solution is temporarily acceptable, although not producing the nicest icon :-|. So I'm not hurry, but the quicker the better. > PS. No, I haven't forgotten about the git repo! Really! For now, I periodically adjust the github one. You can start populating sourceware.org from there: it's better and more recent than the snapshot I sent you. In any case, a true official repo (with possibly write perms for me ;-) would be preferable. Thanks for the reply. Cheers, Patrick