From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-6878-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6830 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2011 15:27:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 6815 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2011 15:27:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BT,TW_DB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:27:49 +0000
Received: by pxi20 with SMTP id 20so3111081pxi.13        for <insight@sourceware.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.249.6 with SMTP id w6mr6329211wfh.116.1302622069089; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.52.168 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DA3DF56.9040202@redhat.com>
References: <4D9F9BB2.1070904@redhat.com> <BANLkTikUobS=rEtZtknNeVJVR=NxT2XTDQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D9FDFD8.7080109@redhat.com> <20110411172402.2ea07ba2@mesquite.lan> <4DA3DF56.9040202@redhat.com>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimu-4QaFNczutwtT9Ze8xR4=GbvWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rotate ChangeLog, fix build issues
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, insight@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <insight.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2

Hi Keith,

My part is OK now.  Thanks.

Best,
Hui

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 13:12, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 05:24 PM, Kevin Buettner wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011-04-08 =A0Keith Seitz<keiths@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* generic/gdbtk-bp.c (tracepoint_exists): Remove recently
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0removed "not_found_ptr" argument from call to decode_lin=
e_1.
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* generic/gdbtk-stack.c (gdb_get_vars_command): Likewise.
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* generic/gdbtk-cmds.c (gdb_get_line_command): Likewise.
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(gdb_get_file_command): Likewise.
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(gdb_get_function_command): Likewise.
>>
>> Was this actually committed?
>>
>
> Well, apparently not! For some reason, I sent out the patch but did not
> commit it. I have done so now. Thank you for pointing that out.
>
>> Here's that change:
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdbtk-register.c (get_register): Delete declaration of =
`buffer'.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Use `valaddr' in its place.
>
> Thanks! I have committed this, too.
>
> Keith
>