From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14192 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 16:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14104 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 16:43:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 16:43:55 -0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (h000393256f12.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.61.199.96]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005022216435401200t1ud0e>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:43:55 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:44:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [Patch] updated configure.in required to enable insight to build on OSX From: Paul Schlie To: Andrew Cagney CC: Nick Clifton , , , , Keith Seitz Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <421B5957.2090704@gnu.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 Actually yes, typically simply co -d src ... and grab everything, then typically merge gcc into it (which I know isn't blessed, but have generally found it more reliable for the things that should likely be in common, to literally be in common; so would be nice to have a top-level configure maintained, it would seem, as I don't think I'm the only one? [personally seems a little archaic for gcc to still remain disassociated from the src cvs tree, and end up having to manually check into both?] > From: Andrew Cagney > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:09:59 -0500 > To: Paul Schlie > Cc: Nick Clifton , , > , , Keith Seitz > > Subject: Re: [Patch] updated configure.in required to enable insight to build > on OSX > > Paul Schlie wrote: >> Actually come to think of it, might there be any quick convenient way >> to disable sim, sid, rda, and libgloss from trying to build without >> being explicitly enabled (or even prevented if explicitly disabled)? >> As I've had to basically manually re-name or remove those directories, >> to prevent them from building when not desired? > > Did you use "cvs update -d" in the top level directory? Neither the > BINUTILS, nor GDB modules check any of those directories out. > > Andrew