RE: Can't find source files

["Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-owner On Behalf Of geneSmith
> Sent: 12 October 2004 17:20

> >   Ah, but it's not concatenating two items in the source path, it's
> > concatenating the filename stored in the debug info inside 
> the file with
> > each of the source path components one by one.  Under no 
> circumstances would
> > it concatenate two different entries from the source path, 
> which is what you
> > seemed to be hoping it would do when you put "/cygdrive/d" and
> > "/usr/home/gene" into the source path and wanted it to look in
> > "/cygdrive/d/usr/home/gene".
> 
> Right, I want it to cat /cygdrive/d (set with dir) to /home/gene/source 
> (obtain from the runtime file). Maybe I didn't explain this clearly.

  You confused me by referring to $cdir, which i didn't think was the same
thing  as the path embedded in the runtime file (else what would be the
point in concatenating it to itself?).  IIUIC, $cdir is just a user-level
convenience variable that you can set however suits you.

> What I have was built by a 3rd party (macraigor) to support their 
> emulator. They tell me the source was not modified in any way. It is 
> from gdb 6.1 according to help|about.

  Well, the new source path features are only in mainline (CVS), not in
either the 6.1 nor the 6.2 release branch.  Seems like they gave you
documentation from a more up-to-date version of gdb than the actual binary
they gave you!

> you have to set dir like this is .gdbinit:
> 
> dir 
> /cygdrive/f/xfer/4.6.1-rtems/tools/build-rtems/powerpc-rtems/c
/myproj/lib/libbsp/powerpc/cp4431adv/startup
> 
> (Plus other dir's for various source levels, quite complex)
> 
> But if I move "build-rtems" directory up to root on the linux box and 
> build there, I eliminate all the ../'s from the exe and all I 
> would need 
> to set in .gdbinit is
> 
> dir /cygdrive/f
> 
> which would be all I need since in exe all source paths rooted at 
> /home/gene/... with no complex backtracking. But this simple 
> case does not seem to work.

  Well, you may _very_ well be able to work around it with a mount point or
symlink or two.

> >   So it depends what kind of directory paths are already in 
> the executable.
> > Use "objdump -g <executable file name>" to take a look.
> 
> When I do this it always says "no recognizable debug 
> information." But 
> the source paths and debug information and source statements 
> can be seen 
> in the file with objdump -Sx <exe file> and with vi. 


  Ummm..... you do have to use the same kind of cross objdump as the cross
compiler and cross debugger, you know.....    [guess it is getting late!]


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....