From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-5087-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15806 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2004 18:12:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15775 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2004 18:12:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2004 18:12:01 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:10:58 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: "'E. Weddington'" <ericw@evcohs.com>
Cc: <insight@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Insight 6.1 compile error in Cygwin
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:12:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <41794C56.5080402@evcohs.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGHmj9n1xxWn9R6000001d6@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2004 18:10:58.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B0BE760:01C4B862]
X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: E. Weddington
> Sent: 22 October 2004 19:07

> Dave Korn wrote:
> 
> >>The reason why I CC'd you Dave, is that I know you're very 
> >>active on the 
> >>Cygwin list. Do you remember anything there that might 
> >>pertain to this?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  That's the second time _TODAY_ and the third time 
> _THIS_WEEK_ that this question
> >has cropped up on *this* very list right here.  The answer 
> to it was in the post
> >*IMMEDIATELY* before your one.  Check the list archives at
> >  
> >
> And my apologies for not seeing the links *after* the quoted 
> post which contained what I was looking for.
> 
> Eric


  LOL, your timing is perfect.  I had just written a reply saying just that[*].
Then I said to myself "Nah, I'll give him another ten seconds, to see if he
notices it himself".  Counted to 10, hit Send/Receive all, got your message,
ditched the draft one I was writing.  Hope you should have all you need to get it
working now!

    cheers, 
      DaveK

[*] And in a non-flamey and only mildly exasperated way, too!
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....