From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Seitz To: Grant Edwards Cc: Subject: Re: 20010807 won't compile for target=arm-elf Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:46:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <20010813123810.B7282@visi.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q3/msg00114.html On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Grant Edwards wrote: > The 2001-08-07 snapshot doesn't include a patch dated > 2001-08-02? ;) I need to get me that kind of calender! I > could have this project done last month and be on vacation now. Hmmm. The CVS log for gdbtk-bp.c shows revision 1.9 date: 2001/08/03 03:37:40; author: kseitz; state: Exp; lines: +6 -6 * generic/gdbtk-bp.c (gdb_get_breakpoint_info): Update with recent breakpoint structure changes in gdb. (gdb_set_bp_addr): Likewise. (gdb_get_tracepoint_info): Update with recent tracepoint structure changes in gdb. Maybe the snapshot process didn't pick it up for some reason. ??? > I'm reconsidering my decision to ship a package based on > a weekly snapshot. I might just go with 5.0 + patches since > that's what I've been using for the past 7-8 months. FWIW, I'll be checking in a "new" register window shortly, which you may want to avoid. I've spent a lot of time making it work, but I've only tested it on a couple of platforms: linux native, cygwin native, cygwin-x-[bleep] and linux-x-[bleep]. I haven't discovered any problems, but it is a chunk of relatively new code... I think that the 5.1 branch and the main repository are in the best shape they've been in for quite some time -- probably best they've been ever. (It's nice not to be distracted by work, eh?) Also note that if you expect to use insight on win98 (heaven forbid), you should get the patch that is in limbo in gdb right now about sigsetjmp/siglongjmp. A problem which, unfortunately, really only shows up in insight (although I can reproduce it in standalone gdb easily enough). Keith