From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@cygnus.com>
To: Ian Roxborough <irox@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, <insight@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Locating Itcl and Itk depandancies.
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:49:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0109051431050.4026-100000@makita.cygnus.com>
References: <3B96942A.6F5C88C6@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q3/msg00235.html

On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Ian Roxborough wrote:

> this seems to be the last little bit for gdb/Insight to make
> it resistant to the Tcl/Tk upgrade.  It removes a couple of
> hard coded paths (for Itcl and Itk library dependencies) and
> uses the ITCL_LIB_FULL_PATH and ITK_LIB_FULL_PATH set in
> itclConfig.sh and itkConfig.sh to set the dependencies.

Has ITCL/ITK_LIB_FULL_PATH _always_ been in itcl/itkConfig.sh? Sheesh. How
did we miss _that_?? O:-)

> I've tested this fix on Windows NT and GNU/Linux x86,
> everything seems to work fine.  If I can get this fix
> checked in today then I maybe able to do the grand Tcl/Tk
> switch over later tonight.

FWIW, I also tried this on linux and linux-cygwin, and it worked just
fine. I think this patch should go in.

You don't seem to be listed in the MAINTAINERS file, so I could commit
this for you. Andrew?

Keith