From: Keith Seitz <keiths@cygnus.com>
To: Ian Roxborough <irox@redhat.com>
Cc: <insight@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: DLL breakpoint bug [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...]
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0110231503580.23825-100000@makita.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BD5EB1C.45CC6233@redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Ian Roxborough wrote:
> It works with "gdb -nw".
Joy. This means that the command-line does some magic that our breakpoint
interfaces don't handle.
> If in the console I type "break tkWinWm.c:4203" it replies that the breakpoint
> is set at that location. But if I look at the breakpoints window it lists
> the breakpoint as being set in tclCompile.c at line 4203. If I use the
> Function Browser to set the same breakpoint it sets it in tclCompile.c at
> line 1109.
This is odd. I would not expect entering the breakpoint at the console
prompt to change the breakpoint. Does "info break" show the right
location? What does "tk gdb_get_breakpoint_info BKPT#" show?
Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-23 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-23 10:20 DLLs and Insight Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 10:27 ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 14:30 ` FYI: DLL breakpoint bug [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...] Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 14:36 ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 14:59 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 15:05 ` Keith Seitz [this message]
2001-10-23 15:14 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 15:21 ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 15:33 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-24 13:33 ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 10:52 ` DLLs and Insight Fernando Nasser
2001-10-23 11:06 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-31 9:24 ` Stack Window Problem [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...] Ian Roxborough
2001-10-31 10:48 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-10-31 11:33 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-31 11:53 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 11:42 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-01 12:44 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-11-01 12:48 ` Keith Seitz
2001-11-01 13:01 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 13:20 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-11-01 14:05 ` Keith Seitz
2001-11-01 15:08 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 15:41 ` Keith Seitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.33.0110231503580.23825-100000@makita.cygnus.com \
--to=keiths@cygnus.com \
--cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=irox@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).