From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@cygnus.com>
To: "Martin M. Hunt" <hunt@redhat.com>
Cc: Insight Mailing List <insight@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbtk_set_result
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:34:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111051131120.13963-100000@makita.cygnus.com>
References: <200111051930.LAA00073@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/msg00271.html

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Martin M. Hunt wrote:

> Should really be xfree() and not FREEIF() shouldn't it.

Well, yes/no. FREEIF should use xfree (but it doesn't). FREEIF just checks
to make sure that the pointer isn't null, that's all.

Actually, that looks like another cleanup that can be made on varobj:
free->xfree.

Otherwise, looks good. Pleaes commit.
Keith