From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16021 invoked by alias); 28 May 2002 16:10:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16000 invoked from network); 28 May 2002 16:10:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2002 16:10:55 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA20937; Tue, 28 May 2002 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA02123; Tue, 28 May 2002 09:10:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:10:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Andrew Cagney cc: Hans Kester , Subject: Re: How is life? In-Reply-To: <3CF3A1B8.10409@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Tue, 28 May 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > 5.2 works for most systems, but not cygwin. Cygwin is having problems > with tcl/tk but the details I don't know. Yeah, I don't know about it either. The new Tcl/Tk just don't work on cygwin very reliably. I don't know why, either. I've looked at some of the work that was done, and there are some obvious problems (like linking with -Wl,-e,_WinMain@16). But even beyond this, I can still get it to crash pretty easily (but deep in the bowels of Tcl/Tk). I am beginning to think that we should take tcl/tk 8.3 out of sources and put it on a branch, putting the old tcl/tk back into sources. Or we could keep the new tcl/tk in sources and put the old tcl onto the release branch for 5.2 (and any future versions). Or we could simply use 8.3 on unix releases and make a "special" cygwin tree off of 5.2 which has the old tcl/tk in it. :-) Keith