From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25054 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2002 20:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25046 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2002 20:34:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 2002 20:34:14 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28791; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id NAA15745; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:34:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:34:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Phil Edwards cc: Subject: Re: Tk lib build doesn't look in the Tcl build directory In-Reply-To: <20020714130640.A28498@disaster.basement.lan> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Phil Edwards wrote: > Am I the only one seeing this? It would seem that the Tk build requires > all the Tcl stuff to have been /installed/, not just built, before it itself > can build. Perhaps the majority (totality?) of the developers already have > a Tcl installation somewhere in the default paths searched by the linker? What does "cat config.status" give? I just built for linux with and without --enable-shared, and it worked just fine. Is it pulling in the right tclConfig.sh (the one in the build tree). Tcl should definately not need to be installed to build tk in our tree. Keith