From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17568 invoked by alias); 5 May 2008 16:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17558 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2008 16:21:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 May 2008 16:21:25 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so1289520wfd.26 for ; Mon, 05 May 2008 09:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.71.15 with SMTP id t15mr2582183wfa.315.1210004484082; Mon, 05 May 2008 09:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.126.20 with HTTP; Mon, 5 May 2008 09:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 16:21:00 -0000 From: "Kefei Lu" To: "Keith Seitz" , insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Problem] I can't do "next" in insight! In-Reply-To: <481F3008.5060200@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <481E4FA4.7080304@redhat.com> <481F2A9C.3010205@redhat.com> <481F3008.5060200@redhat.com> Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 This version of insight was installed from Ubuntu repository. Maybe I need to build one by myself:))) Thanks for your help! On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Keith Seitz wrote: > Kefei Lu wrote: > > > Thanks for the help! I've tried in console mode and the log file is > > post as following. I'll also post this mail at gdb's mailing list. > > Just feel strange why insight suddenly broke and why my gdb 6.6 is > > still working. What I've done? :( > > > > Two points. First, the session you posted is perfect. That is exactly what > GDB folk are going to need to see. Second, You're using gdb 6.6, but you > insight is based on 6.5 -- which is VERY old. At the very least, download > and build the insight 6.6 tarball (or a newer one -- current release is > 6.7.1). I'm not surprised to hear that a gdb of that vintage is having > problems: there was a lot of churn in thread libraries and a bunch of gdb > subsystems around that time. > > Keith > -- Sincerely, Kefei Lu ------------------------ Kefei Lu, Ph.D. candidate Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Univ. of Miami, U.S.A.