* Re: grossly out of date??? @ 2012-10-24 6:40 Roland Schwingel 2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Roland Schwingel @ 2012-10-24 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: insight Hi... insight-owner@sourceware.org wrote on 23.10.2012 17:16:01: > From: Mark Ebersole <markeby@centtech.com> > To: insight@sourceware.org > Date: 23.10.2012 17:18 > Subject: grossly out of date??? > Sent by: insight-owner@sourceware.org > > Insight is probably the best GUI for gdb ever created however, it is > grossly out of date. Where are the developers and what replaces it? You are right in the sense of having a ready to download bundle of insight. But you can build an own version from CVS (depending on the OS you want to run it on). I run it here on linux, native win32 and win64 daily from somewhat current gdb sources. Roland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: grossly out of date??? 2012-10-24 6:40 grossly out of date??? Roland Schwingel @ 2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random 2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave U. Random @ 2012-10-24 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: insight > > Insight is probably the best GUI for gdb ever created however, it is > > grossly out of date. Where are the developers and what replaces it? > > You are right in the sense of having a ready to download bundle of > insight. But you can build an own version from CVS (depending on the OS > you want to run it on). I run it here on linux, native win32 and win64 > daily from somewhat current gdb sources. Yes but the daily CVS is often broken. Like now, for instance :-( ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] 2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random @ 2012-10-24 15:34 ` Keith Seitz 2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Keith Seitz @ 2012-10-24 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave U. Random; +Cc: insight On 10/24/2012 03:59 AM, Dave U. Random wrote: > > Yes but the daily CVS is often broken. Like now, for instance :-( > That's my fault: Lately, I've been doing a lot of debugging (using insight, of course), and I haven't been keeping up on building from HEAD as often as I should. Here is a patch which fixes the build problem. This is the only problem that I noticed. If there are others, please send a note to the list to draw my attention to it. I do try to keep insight building/working. Keith ChangeLog 2012-10-24 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> * generic/gdbtk-hooks.c (gdbtk_memory_changed): Update for API changes. Index: generic/gdbtk-hooks.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-hooks.c,v retrieving revision 1.56 diff -u -p -r1.56 gdbtk-hooks.c --- generic/gdbtk-hooks.c 10 Oct 2012 17:28:03 -0000 1.56 +++ generic/gdbtk-hooks.c 24 Oct 2012 15:29:40 -0000 @@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ static void gdbtk_pre_add_symbol (const static void gdbtk_print_frame_info (struct symtab *, int, int, int); static void gdbtk_post_add_symbol (void); static void gdbtk_register_changed (int regno); -static void gdbtk_memory_changed (CORE_ADDR addr, ssize_t len, - const bfd_byte *data); +static void gdbtk_memory_changed (struct inferior *inferior, CORE_ADDR addr, + ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data); static void gdbtk_selected_frame_changed (int); static void gdbtk_context_change (int); static void gdbtk_error_begin (void); @@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ gdbtk_register_changed (int regno) } static void -gdbtk_memory_changed (CORE_ADDR addr, ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data) +gdbtk_memory_changed (struct inferior *inferior, CORE_ADDR addr, + ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data) { if (Tcl_Eval (gdbtk_interp, "gdbtk_memory_changed") != TCL_OK) report_error (); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] 2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz @ 2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Anonymous @ 2012-10-24 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: insight > Here is a patch which fixes the build problem. This is the only problem > that I noticed. If there are others, please send a note to the list to > draw my attention to it. Thanks for that, I'll try it as soon as I can. > I do try to keep insight building/working. I've had bad luck over the past two years with several builds and when it does build I've had some extremely annoying breakage in assembly language on Intel x86_64. In 32 bit mode it works great. It will be excellent when the x86_64 problems are sorted. Thanks for the help. Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-24 17:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-10-24 6:40 grossly out of date??? Roland Schwingel 2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random 2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz 2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).