From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29326 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2008 03:34:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29317 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2008 03:34:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:34:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m723Y8Ow027683 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:34:08 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m723Y62d019988; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:34:07 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-95.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.95]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m723Y6BS030722; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:34:06 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7D9F6378250; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:34:05 -0600 (MDT) To: Keith Seitz Cc: insight Subject: Re: [PATCH/itcl] Update to Itcl 3.3 References: <4887B505.3080206@redhat.com> <4893AADF.5040600@redhat.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4893AADF.5040600@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Fri\, 01 Aug 2008 17\:31\:27 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> Gdbtk is broken right now until I commit the rest of my outstanding Keith> patches for this... Looks like that cruft is not defined in my build Keith> either (but then my build doesn't link against itcl/itk anymore). Keith> I'll see about speeding up my schedule (or lack thereof). It is no rush. I have one (or two? I forget) deprecated hook removal patches in my queue. These are nothing serious and really unlikely to be obsoleted :) Tom