From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4755 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2010 16:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 4744 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2010 16:53:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:53:01 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2010 16:52:57 -0000 Received: from balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de (EHLO balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de) [131.234.21.37] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 15 Jan 2010 17:52:57 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de) by balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id KWAS89-0000M0-5X for insight@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:52:57 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Build failure on Cygwin Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:53:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Matthias Andree" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Win32) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Sorry for breaking the threading, I've only just subscribed because I am facing the same issue as Jon (reported on Jan 2). This seems to be an imported issue as we get failures from including both winsock2.h or thereabouts (unconditionally) and sys/select.h. I don't know why/how exactly sys/select.h gets pulled in, I haven't seen obvious offending files under tcl/ - so it might be a change and/or bug in Cygwin headers, too. Is there a particular reason why Insight compiles its own Tcl, rather than grab the system default if there is one? Or is there a way to talk Insight into using a system Tcl? Cygwin has a Tcl/Tk package after all, why not use that? TIA -- Matthias Andree