From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68959 invoked by alias); 13 May 2015 07:53:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68932 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2015 07:53:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 13 May 2015 07:53:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0B42851418; Wed, 13 May 2015 09:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alPaZiItBodI; Wed, 13 May 2015 09:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC4D128512EC; Wed, 13 May 2015 09:53:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch] Clean up detection of SJLJ exceptions in target libraries Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 07:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <12672847.DL7QB5ox74@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.10-1.29-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <555261D4.2030606@redhat.com> References: <1440100.16fMh0Bpp2@polaris> <555261D4.2030606@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 > Generally OK. However, please confirm with ian on the libgo bits just > in case you're hitting something that's shared with golang. OK, I can certainly wait for Ian's approval for the libgo bits. > We could certainly consider cleaning up the targets (hppa). That'd be a > fine follow-up :-) ISTM we ought to be moving away from the EH model > being something we explicitly ask for via enable/disable options on the > configure command line. It's more in Dave's court. :-) I don't think we have any PA machine up and running at AdaCore these days. > I trust you'll keep an eye out for any fallout. Yes, I'm back in the SJLJ business. -- Eric Botcazou