From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129276 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2016 21:18:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129253 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2016 21:18:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=deleting, surprise X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 21:17:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B9F4E4D6; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 21:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-177.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.177]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u86LHsDJ006072; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:17:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Jakub Jelinek , Richard Biener References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> <20160906090831.GD14857@tucnak.redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Haley , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <1323d2ff-261d-4623-e61e-543f47b824c8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 21:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160906090831.GD14857@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On 09/06/2016 03:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote: >>>> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>>> >>>> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts? >>> >>> There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else >>> is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a >>> time, rather cautiously. >> >> Ok, that sounds reasonable. >> >> You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until after the >> GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object. > > No objection from me. No objection from me either (I'm guessing that's not a surprise). jeff