From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23115 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 11:03:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 23107 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 11:03:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_IB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (80.101.103.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:03:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1332759797.2848.34.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Subject: Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC From: Mark Wielaard To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Andrew Haley , classpath-patches@gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <4F70306B.5090607@redhat.com> <1332756668.2848.30.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <4F7049F8.4050405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:53 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> Btw, why are people not fixing GNU Classpath upstream-first? > > > > Because, I guess, no-one is using it. At least, if they were, this > > bug would have been noticed. >=20 > Right. I'm developing and testing with Fedora and Ubuntu on x86 and I > verify GNU Classpath bootstrap on Darwin at times. I guess Buildbot > would help here. It is there on GNU/Linux, OpenBSD and Solaris at least, but there might be termios out there (apparently freebsd at least) that don't have IUCLC. Buildbot is on the TODO list :) Of course even with that we need slaves for some of the more obscure platforms. Cheers, Mark