From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20631-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2353 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2013 09:17:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 2340 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2013 09:17:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_GJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (212.238.236.112)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:17:20 +0000
Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl ([212.238.236.112] helo=[172.31.17.37])	by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <mark@klomp.org>)	id 1TtEG9-0002wV-D8; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:17:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] [patch] let gjavah accept -source 1.[567]
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Cc: classpath-patches@gnu.org, GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <1357548868.3792.27.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org>
References: <50D1BA96.8000600@ubuntu.com>	 <20121219173749.GA22367@toonder.wildebeest.org>	 <50E9ADB8.3000700@ubuntu.com>	 <1357548868.3792.27.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1357809434.3792.106.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 19.12.2012 18:37, schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > > If you really meant gjdoc I think it would be OK to try to accept it,
> > > but maybe with a warning message that it is untested?
> > 
> > yes, I meant gjdoc. Here is an updated patch.
> > 
> >   Matthias
> > 
> > 	* tools/gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/Main.java: Accept -source 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.
> 
> That looks reasonable to me.

As requested on irc, I have pushed this patch to the git repo for
Matthias.

Cheers,

Mark