From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-18827-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 719 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 12:08:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 622 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2007 12:08:42 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:08:38 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7SC8adi008318 	for <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:08:36 -0400
Received: from zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (vpn-14-6.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.6]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7SC8VVl010369; 	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:08:33 -0400
Received: from littlepinkcloud.COM (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l7SC8Ser015109; 	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:08:30 +0100
Received: (from aph@localhost) 	by littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5/Submit) id l7SC8RAm015106; 	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:08:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <18132.4155.220371.594948@zebedee.pink>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:08:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM>
To: Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: aph@all6500.kos.to, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ARM EABI and eclipse-ecj
In-Reply-To: <622847.44026.qm@web25015.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <18131.56752.293473.183448@zebedee.pink> 	<622847.44026.qm@web25015.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.93.1
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2

Steven Newbury writes:
 > 
 > --- Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM> wrote:
 
 > > I just got a nearly perfect set of test scores.  Throw_2 is expected
 > > (indeed, designed) to fail, so no problem there.  TestClosureGC is a
 > > weird one, but not worth worrying about ATM.  As far as I can see
 > > we're good to go.
 > > 
 > > Let me know your results.
 > 
 > I won't be able to do much until later in the week.  I have noticed that gij is
 > quite a bit slower than jamvm (using libffi) on some benchmark tests,

That's true on all platforms: gij is a very simple bytecode
interpreter.  gcj wins with precompilation.

Andrew.