public inbox for java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFT: The remainder of the InetAddress merge
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060925122049.GA3888@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A0VRA5EALJ8498D9FC1IC86OL5YJFQO.4515eda7@d9300>

Mohan Embar wrote:
> Mohan Embar wrote:
> > Gary Benson wrote:
> > > This patch is the second half of the InetAddress merge whose
> > > first half I committed earlier today.  It removes GCJ's custom
> > > InetAddress, and replaces the glue methods in VMInetAddress
> > > with real native code.
> > 
> > I am trying to build on Win32 with the patch you sent me off list
> > on 21 Sep and am getting this. Probably something simple like a
> > conflicting declaration but I won't be able to look into this more
> > until at least tonight: ...
> 
> I was able to work around the build errors by changing the offending
> lines (64 & 81) of natVMInetAddressWin32.cc to:
> 
>   JvSynchronize sync (&java::net::VMInetAddress::class$);
> 
> (added address-of operator (&) - don't why the POSIX stuff builds
> okay without it).

Hmmm, no idea :)  But I added it to the Posix methods too...

> The build worked and passed the attached test, which is more testing
> than this class has probably ever offically gotten on Win32. Your
> patch gets my thumbs-up for the Win32 portion.

Thank you.  I'll post an updated patch shortly.  With luck we can get
this into 4.2.

> I haven't tested the security portion of this.  Let me know if you
> think that's necessary.

It shouldn't be.  The security checks are all in Java now, shared
across all platforms, so testing on any one of them should be
sufficient.

Thanks again,
Gary

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-25 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-20  8:52 FYI: Partial " Gary Benson
2006-09-20 12:15 ` RFT: The remainder of the " Gary Benson
2006-09-23 14:20   ` Mohan Embar
2006-09-24  2:29     ` Mohan Embar
2006-09-25 12:21       ` Gary Benson [this message]
2006-09-25 14:58   ` RFC: Updated " Gary Benson
2006-11-03 10:23     ` FYI: " Gary Benson
2006-11-03 11:48       ` Anthony Green
2006-11-03 11:56         ` Gary Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060925122049.GA3888@redhat.com \
    --to=gbenson@redhat.com \
    --cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).