From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105655 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2015 14:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105645 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2015 14:11:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:11:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LEBUpO021814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:11:30 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.37]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LEBSj3006221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:11:29 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3LEBQMu008464; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:11:27 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t3LEBPpb008463; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:11:25 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:11:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Matthias Klose Cc: GCJ-patches , "gcc-patches@gnu.org" Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname Message-ID: <20150421141125.GW1725@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle, Is that really needed though these days? Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years? The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a while. Jakub