From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Cc: GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-patches@gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421143747.GY1725@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55365EE0.8070202@ubuntu.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:29:52PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 04:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:16:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 04/21/2015 04:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>>> bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle,
> >>>
> >>> Is that really needed though these days?
> >>> Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and
> >>> libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years?
> >>> The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure
> >>> changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a while.
> >>
> >> yes, the GCC version is embedded in the GCJ_VERSIONED_LIBDIR
> >>
> >> which is defined as
> >>
> >> gcjsubdir=gcj-$gcjversion-$libgcj_soversion
> >> dbexecdir='$(toolexeclibdir)/'$gcjsubdir
> >
> > But why is that an argument for bumping it? If both GCC 5 and GCC 6 will
> > (likely) provide the same ABI in the library, there is no reason not to use
> > the same directory for those.
>
> but currently there are different directories used (gcjversion already changed
> on the trunk) and compiled into the library. Do you mean that gcjsubdir should
> be just defined as gcj?
What depends on BASE-VER sure, that is bumped automatically and should track
the gcc version. But the soname, which is an unrelated number, there is no
point to bump it. If you have a packaging issue, just solve it on the
packaging side, but really there is no point to yearly bump a soname of
something that doesn't change at all (and is really dead project for many
years).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 14:07 Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-21 14:16 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-21 14:29 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:37 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2016-01-02 14:40 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-02 15:40 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-02 15:53 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-02 16:11 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 11:38 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 14:17 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 15:52 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 16:23 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 17:34 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 19:04 ` Mike Stump
2016-01-03 22:14 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 17:04 ` Andrew Hughes
2015-04-21 17:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-21 17:17 ` Andrew Hughes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150421143747.GY1725@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=doko@ubuntu.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).