From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>,
GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421171033.GA1725@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540967716.3621440.1429635844249.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:04:04PM -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle,
> >
> > Is that really needed though these days?
> > Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and
> > libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years?
> > The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure
> > changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a while.
> >
>
> On the Classpath side, there's a bunch of stuff to merge in that would
> change the ABI. It's a matter of finding a good point at which to do it
> and time to do so. I keep missing the right point in the gcc lifecycle.
Now might be a good time (any time next 6.5 months or so), and if that is
done, surely I have no issue with bumping the soname.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 14:07 Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-21 14:16 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-21 14:29 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 14:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-01-02 14:40 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-02 15:40 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-02 15:53 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-02 16:11 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 11:38 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 14:17 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 15:52 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 16:23 ` Andrew Haley
2016-01-03 17:34 ` Matthias Klose
2016-01-03 19:04 ` Mike Stump
2016-01-03 22:14 ` Matthias Klose
2015-04-21 17:04 ` Andrew Hughes
2015-04-21 17:10 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2015-04-21 17:17 ` Andrew Hughes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150421171033.GA1725@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=doko@ubuntu.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=gnu.andrew@redhat.com \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).