From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40436 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2015 17:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40402 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2015 17:10:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:10:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LHAdpb011177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:10:40 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.37]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LHAax4014296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:10:38 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3LHAZGf027685; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:10:35 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t3LHAXOj027676; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:10:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:10:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Andrew Hughes Cc: Matthias Klose , GCJ-patches , gcc-patches@gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname Message-ID: <20150421171033.GA1725@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> <20150421141125.GW1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <540967716.3621440.1429635844249.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540967716.3621440.1429635844249.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:04:04PM -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle, > > > > Is that really needed though these days? > > Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and > > libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years? > > The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure > > changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a while. > > > > On the Classpath side, there's a bunch of stuff to merge in that would > change the ABI. It's a matter of finding a good point at which to do it > and time to do so. I keep missing the right point in the gcc lifecycle. Now might be a good time (any time next 6.5 months or so), and if that is done, surely I have no issue with bumping the soname. Jakub