From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7341 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 14:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7311 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2013 14:44:51 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GC autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx4-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:44:50 +0000 Received: from zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.15]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3FEinPN010926; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:44:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:44:00 -0000 From: Jon VanAlten To: Matthias Klose Cc: GCJ-patches , Jon VanAlten , classpath@gnu.org, Tom Tromey Message-ID: <439454453.517225.1366037089130.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <516BD4B9.8040101@ubuntu.com> References: <516BD4B9.8040101@ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: [patch] update ecj to ecj-3.8.2/4.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Klose" > To: "GCJ-patches" > Cc: "Jon VanAlten" , classpath@gnu.org, "Tom Tromey" > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 6:21:45 AM > Subject: [patch] update ecj to ecj-3.8.2/4.2.2 > > It looks like this ecj is already used > within the Fedora disto, however only locally patched (at least I couldn't > find > any mail sent to java-patches). > My bad. I honestly didn't have any idea what the upstream process would be. My history in the free java world starts after openjdk/icedtea, so all the gcj fluff isn't really known well to me, and I don't really know where to look for information (pointers appreciated! :D ). So I sort of let it slip through the cracks. I did bring it up on an earlier thread[1], and it seems like by accident it also went to java-patches. Now I know for next time, if and when there is a next time. cheers, jon [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2013-March/022168.html