From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7584 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 19:28:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7569 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2006 19:28:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:28:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5KJSdq5009412 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:28:39 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5KJScdx028017; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:28:38 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.67] (towel.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.67]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5KJScve028771; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:28:38 -0400 Message-ID: <44984C65.6070703@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:28:00 -0000 From: Bryce McKinlay User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz CC: Java Patch List Subject: Re: [RFA] Boehm GC support addition for debugging References: <4496CF73.7000507@redhat.com> <449848BF.8070503@redhat.com> <44984B0B.2050205@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <44984B0B.2050205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 Keith Seitz wrote: >> OK, but please check in the Boehm GC patch at the same time and >> remove the #ifdef's. This is trunk we're talking about, and the >> thread suspension code is unlikely to break anything that currently >> works. If there are problems discovered with the thread suspension >> code, then we can just fix them in trunk. > > Hmm. Okay, well, so should I consider the GC patch "approved" _for > now_ (or at least until it is a problem for me)? Yes, it is approved for libgcj trunk. Bryce