From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com>
Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44ABD5D0.2010305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8g0a0$r80$1@sea.gmane.org>
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>> The stack-trace changes to:
>> --------------------------- 8< ---------------------------
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: I don't like you!
>> at java.lang.VMThrowable.fillInStackTrace(a.exe)
>> at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(a.exe)
>> --------------------------- 8< ---------------------------
>>
>
> Since methods are called via the atable, the calling
> instruction is no longer a simple "CALL <XYZ>". The
> hack in fallback_backtrace() therefore doesn't work
> for methods called via indirect dispatch.
>
I don't think it'll work for ordinary virtual calls either, or even
non-local calls in a non-static-linked binary.
Bryce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-05 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-26 18:16 Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-26 18:38 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-06-27 2:23 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 11:27 ` Marco Trudel
2006-06-27 11:38 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 12:37 ` Marco Trudel
2006-06-27 13:14 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 21:20 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-06-26 19:06 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-26 19:15 ` Tom Tromey
2006-06-26 19:20 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-27 1:29 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 8:33 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-27 9:11 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 9:29 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-27 21:57 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-07-05 9:22 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-07-05 15:08 ` Bryce McKinlay [this message]
2006-07-05 15:51 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-07-05 16:07 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-07-05 17:13 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-07-05 17:20 ` Andrew Haley
2006-07-05 17:35 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-07-05 17:39 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-27 15:28 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-27 19:57 ` Tom Tromey
2006-06-28 2:51 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-28 13:56 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-28 15:02 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-06-28 15:15 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-28 15:45 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-06-28 15:49 ` Bryce McKinlay
2006-06-28 16:11 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-29 4:06 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-29 16:27 ` Ranjit Mathew
2006-06-29 18:27 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44ABD5D0.2010305@redhat.com \
--to=mckinlay@redhat.com \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rmathew@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).