From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1406 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2006 14:20:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1398 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2006 14:20:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.gmx.de (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:20:41 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Oct 2006 14:20:38 -0000 Received: from 217-162-79-235.dclient.hispeed.ch (EHLO [192.168.0.192]) [217.162.79.235] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 06 Oct 2006 16:20:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #23581252 Message-ID: <45266643.5070003@gmx.ch> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:20:00 -0000 From: Marco Trudel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ranjit Mathew CC: Java Patch List Subject: Re: regression: [MinGW] Slightly More Robust Stacktraces on Windows References: <452655F1.9010009@gmx.ch> <39399b9d0610060656v3cfdb42etf240c59ab59fbfca@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <39399b9d0610060656v3cfdb42etf240c59ab59fbfca@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Ranjit Mathew wrote: > On 10/6/06, Marco Trudel wrote: >> I refer to this patch: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00051.html >> >> This breaks JNI in certain cases. The application just silently dies >> when trying to run a native method. >> Unfortunately it is a foreign library, I do not have it's source code to >> track the problem down. >> So Ranjit, do you have an idea what it could be? > > Sorry, off the top of my head I don't. You will have to > debug this. If asked for a wild guess, I would say > that libffi doesn't have frame-pointers enabled. > > Sorry I couldn't be of more help, Can we then revert that patch? I'm running out of time for my project and I needed already 2 days to track the problem down to that patch. I tried reverting only that patch but it fails. Reverting backtrace.h to the previous revision (115069) doesn't work as well. My application doesn't even start (with the patch it dies when trying to load the lib in question) Marco