From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19375 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2008 23:21:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19359 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2008 23:21:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from adelie.canonical.com (HELO adelie.canonical.com) (91.189.90.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:20:48 +0000 Received: from [82.211.81.181] (helo=hutte.canonical.com) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian)) id 1JJGnt-0002zi-9g; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:20:45 +0000 Received: from dslb-088-073-082-108.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.82.108] helo=[192.168.42.110]) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJGnt-0003HN-2n; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:20:45 +0000 Message-ID: <479D11CD.5060807@ubuntu.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:21:00 -0000 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071229) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tromey@redhat.com CC: GCJ-patches Subject: Re: Patch: FYI: -reverse argument for native2ascii References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey schrieb: > I'm checking this in to Classpath and libgcj. > > Sun's native2ascii accepts -reverse, while we accept -reversed. > This changes Classpath to conform. > > This bug came from the IcedTea build: > > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103 > > Tom > > ChangeLog: > 2008-01-24 Tom Tromey > > * resource/gnu/classpath/tools/native2ascii/messages.properties > (Native2ASCII.ReversedHelpCompat): New. > * tools/gnu/classpath/tools/native2ascii/Native2ASCII.java > (createParser): Add -reverse. Update -reversed. ? libjava/classpath/tools/classes/gnu/classpath/tools/native2ascii/Native2ASCII$3.class I see a new file generated after this patch, which is not checked in. Please could you verify? Thanks, Matthias