From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30347 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2009 01:00:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 30326 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2009 01:00:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.144) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:00:19 +0000 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so324263eyh.14 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.211.166.2 with SMTP id t2mr3093329ebo.9.1240707616622; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?82.6.108.62? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm4067683eya.29.2009.04.25.18.00.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49F3B4B0.6010400@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:00:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Dave Korn , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix PR38892: "--enable-libgcj-debug" breaks bootstrap. References: <49EF6F29.2000601@gmail.com> <49EFA476.5080305@gmail.com> <49EFD607.6020007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes: > > Dave> Well, as it happens :) > Dave> libjava/ChangeLog > > [...] > > Dave> * classpath/configure.ac: Likewise. > Dave> * classpath/native/jni/classpath/jcl.h: Likewise. > Dave> * classpath/native/jni/java-lang/java_lang_VMDouble.c: Likewise. > > I think you should not need any changes to Classpath. > Classpath code won't include the CNI headers, and so should not have > the problem. Is that not the case? > > Tom I didn't check, I just did a mechanical search and replace; I'll try reverting the classpath changes and check it's still ok. cheers, DaveK