From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-19643-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30768 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2009 03:08:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 30745 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2009 03:08:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f210.google.com) (209.85.219.210)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:08:14 +0000
Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1482362ewy.8         for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.139.9 with SMTP id m9mr3546854ebd.76.1248404891066;         Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1169310eyg.6.2009.07.23.20.08.09         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A6928A5.9010001@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:08:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
CC: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>,   GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, Java Patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,   Rainer Emrich <rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Cygwin bootstrap, PR40807 and all significant FAILs  on  win32.
References: <4A676BBB.3060104@gmail.com> <4A683873.2020800@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A683873.2020800@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

Andrew Haley wrote:

> Did you run the gcj testsuite?  If so, what were the results?

  Java tests completed.  No significant differences.  (Some noise present as
always in the process/thread tests, but these are an ever-present factor
probably caused by a bug in cygwin's pthread support somewhere; something I
will address later).  Disappointing that it didn't fix anything, but I guess
the libjava testsuite doesn't exercise nearly as many return types as the
libffi testsuite.

  Ok now?

    cheers,
      DaveK