On 06/02/2010 06:29, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 22:26, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
>> libjava/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	PR java/42811
>> 	* configure.ac (libgcj_spec_lgcj_override): Add undefined reference
>> 	to arbitrary symbol in noncore library.
>> 	(libgcj_spec_lgcj_bc_override): Likewise.
>>
>>   I'm taking this for a bootstrap-and-test cycle on i686-pc-cygwin.  Does it
>> seem like a reasonable approach?
> 
>   It caused a regression:
> 
>> FAIL: events output

  I've now tracked this regression down to a use of uninitialised memory in
the core vm code(*), which appears to be entirely unrelated to (and presumably
entirely accidentally exposed by) this patch.  So, I'm reviving it.  I'm
running a full testsuite now for the combined patch, but I've already verified
this regression no longer appears.

libjava/ChangeLog:

	PR java/42811
	* configure.ac (libgcj_spec_lgcj_override): Add undefined reference
	to arbitrary symbol in noncore library.
	(libgcj_spec_lgcj_bc_override): Likewise.
	configure: Regenerate.
	* jvmti.cc (_Jv_GetJVMTIEnv): Fix use of uninitialised memory
	exposed by the above change.

  Bootstrapped on i686-pc-cygwin; currently running check-target-libjava only.
 Assuming no regressions this time, OK for head?

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
(*) - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2010-02/msg00002.html