From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4562 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2010 12:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4547 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2010 12:02:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:02:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8NC2Wld016634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:02:33 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-95.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.95]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8NC2VPF018685; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:02:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4C9B41D7.5040506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:02:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Ping^2 Re: Replace translate_options with .opt aliases References: <4C99B9E4.8000101@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On 22/09/10 16:15, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 21/09/10 15:34, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> Ping^2. The Java and Ada parts of this patch >>> are pending >>> review. >>> >> >> I replied to this already. > > It appears that reply was only on java-patches so I didn't see it. Yes, > the patch is not intended to cause user-visible changes, except in cases > where the original behavior was unambiguously buggy such as > "--define-macro=" swallowing the next argument. That's fine, then. Andrew.