From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4992 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2011 12:47:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 4983 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2011 12:47:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_IB,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:47:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6BCl9ZH025640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:47:09 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6BCl8co023823; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:47:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1AF0CB.5040300@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch] Disable static build for libjava References: <4E15DE84.5030809@ubuntu.com> <4E15E3F6.3050502@cavium.com> <4E15E56E.4070209@ubuntu.com> <4E15E6AF.4050508@cavium.com> <4E15F34D.7050800@redhat.com> <4E16158D.3060206@ubuntu.com> <20110707202659.GT2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110707203554.280270@gmx.net> <4E1875CA.9050309@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: <4E1875CA.9050309@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q3/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On 09/07/11 16:37, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 07/07/2011 10:35 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:26:59PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:22:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> +AC_PROG_LIBTOOL >> >> This tests the wrong compiler and toolchain. The compiler you want >> to test doesn't exist yet at the time this configure script is run. >> So you might as well deduce the switch you need from a fixed set or >> other GCC configure data. >> >> Or you put AC_PROG_LIBTOOL in libjava/ but pass down the value of >> enable_static_libjava as --en/disable-static there. > > here is the updated patch. AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is already called in libjava/ > > ok to install? OK by me. Ralf, is this OK? Andrew.