From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15043 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2011 16:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 15013 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2011 16:41:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:40:59 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so985105wyf.20 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.5.209 with SMTP id 59mr832174wel.66.1312994457862; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (93-34-199-31.ip51.fastwebnet.it [93.34.199.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b47sm708797wed.22.2011.08.10.09.40.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E42B494.9010309@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:00:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Orth CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Ralf Wildenhues , Ian Lance Taylor , Steve Ellcey , Richard Earnshaw , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Nick Clifton , Douglas Rupp , Tristan Gingold , Mike Stump , Kaz Kojima , David Edelsohn , Sterling Augustine , Arnaud Charlet , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Nicola Pero , libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2) References: <4E42AACB.2080802@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q3/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On 08/10/2011 06:05 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: >>> >> True: it is called once per multilib. >> > >> > Just to doublecheck, are we sure that unwind.h is always the same? > Yep: it's unwind-generic.h for almost all targets, just a few arm > targets use config/arm/unwind-arm.h for all multilibs. Patch doing rm -f is preapproved then. Paolo