From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31546 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 16:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 31521 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 16:29:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:29:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJGT7Dk014826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:29:07 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-65.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.65]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJGT6AJ018764; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:29:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4EEF6652.5060809@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Unreviewed Ada, libffi patches References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On 12/19/2011 04:20 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > I'm unsure who's to approve libffi patches since MAINTAINERS lists none > at the moment. I'll do it, but I normally bounce libffi patches off upstream first. I couldn't tell whether your patch would always build a 64-bit multilib on x86. Andrew.