From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23260 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2012 17:55:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 23239 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2012 17:55:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_IB,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com (HELO mail3.caviumnetworks.com) (12.108.191.235) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:55:00 +0000 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.9]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,7,2,8378) id ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:56:43 -0800 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.9]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:54:59 -0800 Received: from dd1.caveonetworks.com ([64.2.3.195]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:54:59 -0800 Message-ID: <4F564F72.4040207@cavium.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:55:00 -0000 From: David Daney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Orth CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson , Bruce Korb , Arnaud Charlet , Tristan Gingold Subject: Re: Remove obsolete Tru64 UNIX V5.1B support References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On 03/06/2012 05:14 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" writes: > >>> There's one particular issue: the change to java/io/File.java required >>> my to regenerate the .class file in classpath. I've used Sun javac >>> -target 1.5 for that and hope I got it right. >> >> I'd have expected regeneration to use GCJ built to use ECJ, though I don't >> know. > > I've never tried this. Given that the .class file lives below > libjava/classpath and has to be synced with upstream Classpath anyway, I > hope the Java maintainers will take care of that. > This it documented (although perhaps badly) in install/configure.html You should use --enable-java-maintainer-mode, this will cause the build to use ecj and gjavah to regenerate all the generated files in the 'standard' manner. > At least with the javac-built File.class I had no libjava testsuite > failures. > It probably results in a usable .class file, but is error prone and not very reproducible. David Daney