From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20515-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1808 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2012 11:29:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 1792 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2012 11:29:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BF
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:29:02 +0000
Received: from dslb-088-073-114-053.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.114.53] helo=[192.168.42.210])	by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)	(Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <doko@ubuntu.com>)	id 1SGTpE-00020Q-8b; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:29:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4F8024F6.2010203@ubuntu.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:29:00 -0000
From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120402 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
CC: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org,  David Gilbert <david.gilbert@linaro.org>, GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3
References: <CACxje586xNJF1J4mOZeqD9HCUbuR7iK6Eb+dtYCUEZ3y12zagA@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7F5233.7060508@ubuntu.com> <CACxje59J6pSHYsiZwNCM=AOix9FpOv9U+o1J0Rjkmp=_uH=kqg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACxje59J6pSHYsiZwNCM=AOix9FpOv9U+o1J0Rjkmp=_uH=kqg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

On 06.04.2012 23:01, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Matthias Klose<doko@ubuntu.com>  wrote:
>> I see that some of the armhf-variadic patches are not applied, attached.
>>   Please could you confirm if dropping these changes is deliberate?
>
> Could you please double check this?  I see that the two test case
> tweaks are missing, but the third patch fragment seems wrong.
> src/arc/ffi.c does include ffi_prep_cif_machdep_var().

you are right about ffi.c, just the test case patches are missing.