From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20533-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7423 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2012 16:22:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 7394 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2012 16:22:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:22:20 +0000
Received: from dslb-088-073-081-176.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.81.176] helo=[192.168.42.210])	by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)	(Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <doko@ubuntu.com>)	id 1SjC3N-0006YR-5K; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:22:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4FE88FF5.60208@ubuntu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:22:00 -0000
From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
CC: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [gcc/libgcc/ada/libstdc++] Match arm*-*-linux-*eabi* for ARM Linux/GNU EABI
References: <4FE854B6.9070500@ubuntu.com> <4FE86608.8020808@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE86608.8020808@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2

On 25.06.2012 15:22, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 25/06/12 13:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> gcc/config.gcc now allows matching arm*-*-linux-*eabi* instead of
>> arm*-*-linux-*eabi for ARM Linux/GNU EABI.  This changes the matching in various
>> other places as well. arm-linux-gnueabihf is used as a triplet by some
>> distributions.
>>
>> Ok for the trunk?
>>
> 
> now that all arm-linux ports are EABI conforming, why can't this just become
> 
> 	arm*-*-linux*
> ?

I assume it could. But I didn't check for other places where this would be needed.