From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Remove unused java/expr.c:force_evaluation_order
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFD512E.7080201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABu31nNN0cVxWovi23OBaECeoN9jUywjAizLMaBF7gMa8BG1tA@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/11/2012 10:44 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Remove force_evaluation_order because the only caller is
> force_evaluation_order itself.
> Will commit after a few days, if no-one objects.
No problem. I presume that its caller was removed because it wasn't
needed, but I don't quite know why it wasn't needed. Perhaps it's a
side-effect of the Tree-SSA conversion.
Andrew.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 9:45 Steven Bosscher
2012-07-11 10:11 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFD512E.7080201@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).