From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31103 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 17:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30982 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2012 17:14:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:14:14 +0000 Received: from dslb-088-073-108-045.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.108.45] helo=[192.168.42.216]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlNDg-0004LZ-Ef; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:14:12 +0000 Message-ID: <50D1F5E1.7030303@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:14:00 -0000 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Haley CC: GCJ-patches Subject: Re: [patch] classpath merge 20121202 References: <50BC8729.6090003@ubuntu.com> <50C76BEC.7060505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50C76BEC.7060505@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Am 11.12.2012 18:22, schrieb Andrew Haley: > On 12/03/2012 11:04 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Prepared a classpath merge from classpath 20121202. >> >> - branches/CLASSPATH was updated to: >> >> - import classpath from git://git.savannah.gnu.org/classpath.git >> commit c814d82e5a435f93150cd28b7cf0f9d600ff400d >> - add m4/lib-{ld,link,prefix}.m4 >> >> The additional m4 files were taken from the gettext sources, >> necessary to regenerate the auto* files. >> >> The merge itself didn't show up any issues. The testsuite doesn't show any >> regressions. Not attaching a diff of the regenerated header and class files. >> Ok for the trunk? > > Yes. Unless anyone has any specific objections, I don't propose to > review the Classpath changes themselves because they've already > been reviewed. now committed, regenerated the header files with the gjavah from the merge. Matthias