From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30292 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 09:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30275 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2012 09:51:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:51:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBL9pFnx029564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:51:15 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBL9pCWM025104; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:51:13 -0500 Message-ID: <50D43110.7090209@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: Rainer Orth , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [wwwdocs,Java] Obsolete GCJ FAQ entry for Solaris? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On 12/21/2012 04:02 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > PING. > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> Rainer (or others), >> >> the FAQ entry below seems obsolete to me (dates back more than a >> decade). Shall we remove it, or is there something else we still >> should document (in addition to gcc/doc/install.texi)? OK, thanks. Andrew.