From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20653-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28988 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2013 11:26:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28941 invoked by uid 89); 30 Mar 2013 11:26:42 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BF autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:26:39 +0000
Received: from dslb-088-073-070-067.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.70.67] helo=[192.168.42.216])	by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)	(Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <doko@ubuntu.com>)	id 1ULtvf-00066M-3M; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:26:35 +0000
Message-ID: <5156CBE5.2090608@ubuntu.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:26:00 -0000
From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
CC: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,  Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libffi-discuss@sourceware.org" <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ping] Re: [patch] [libffi] do not install libffi library, headers and documentation
References: <511A35DC.7060207@ubuntu.com>	<CAFiYyc1RD88sGeA995Nds3ffkBmUWXVDBpAxW0pmeVUKhoO+8w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc1u5t9YKY5Pi_uZvej6xy4ihW_CvgsoR=MqPjKoZ6=9_A@mail.gmail.com>	<51225EBE.1050509@ubuntu.com>	<CAFiYyc0xEARf_whS5J=9w2wYBPYbiuJ7gdwsOD=_+PyRf+sz0Q@mail.gmail.com>	<5151FF27.6040606@ubuntu.com>	<CAKOQZ8xZL=pFGX1G1343EcDZ7gPEjo5bKPfcJXAtmxkg8eEU-A@mail.gmail.com> <CACxje5-cFFT+7ho=fBdRaxjNzYLe-aoW9NU6X3NT0P8QyPQT6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACxje5-cFFT+7ho=fBdRaxjNzYLe-aoW9NU6X3NT0P8QyPQT6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2

Am 26.03.2013 21:48, schrieb Anthony Green:
> For what it's worth, this patch is fine by me.  I had originally
> proposed that GCC not install these bits.

now applied on trunk and the 4.8 branch.

> As far as maintainers go, I thought that I was once listed in the
> MAINTAINERS file.  Feel free to add Andrew Haley and/or myself.

I didn't hear back form Andrew.  Could you do this yourself, maybe updating
libffi on trunk to the 3.0.13 release? ;)

  Matthias