From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14804 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2013 08:13:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14793 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2013 08:13:16 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:13:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3G8DE6M008545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:13:14 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.41]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3G8DBiM019558; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: <516D0817.506@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: Matthias Klose , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable java for aarch64 References: <516A8BDB.6000305@redhat.com> <516BACBF.6000000@ubuntu.com> <516BC109.3060601@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On 04/16/2013 08:45 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> slow_pthread_self=no >> can_unwind_signal=no >> CHECKREFSPEC=-fcheck-references >> DIVIDESPEC=-fuse-divide-subroutine > > With these settings, I get the following results: > > # of expected passes 2574 > # of unexpected failures 8 > # of untested testcases 4 That's much better. > FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test > FAIL: Throw_2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test > FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 execution - source compiled test > FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test > FAIL: sourcelocation output - source compiled test > FAIL: sourcelocation -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test > FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 output - source compiled test > FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test The Throw_2 failure is what I'd expect. I don't know what the cause of the sourcelocation failure is; that's a pointer to a problem in gcc or in binutils. The patch can go in. Andrew.